🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."